Exploring The Debate: Lowering Legal Drinking Age

The minimum legal drinking age has been a topic of debate for several years. While some countries have a minimum legal drinking age of 21, others have set it at 18 or 19. In the United States, the minimum legal drinking age is 21, and it has been argued that this has reduced drunk driving fatalities and saved lives. On the other hand, some believe that the minimum legal drinking age should be lowered, as it may encourage responsible drinking and reduce the appeal of alcohol to teens. Additionally, some countries allow underage consumption of alcohol under certain circumstances, such as parental supervision or religious purposes. With changing perceptions of alcohol, particularly among young people, the debate around the minimum legal drinking age continues to evolve.

Arguments for lowering the drinking age to 18 or 19

The legal drinking age varies across the world, with most countries setting the minimum age at 18, and others at 19. In the US, the legal drinking age is 21, which is higher than in Canada (18 or 19, depending on the province), Mexico (18), and most western European countries (typically 16 or 18).

There are several arguments for lowering the drinking age to 18 or 19. Firstly, it is argued that the current law prohibiting drinking until the age of 21 is not working and is counterproductive. By making alcohol forbidden, it becomes an enticing "forbidden fruit", a "badge of rebellion against authority", and a symbol of adulthood. This leads to irresponsible drinking, as seen in the increase in alcohol toxicity and, in some cases, death from alcohol poisoning among college-age youth.

Secondly, it is argued that a lower drinking age would allow for responsible drinking to be taught through role modeling and educational programs in controlled environments such as restaurants, pubs, and official school functions. Young adults would be expected to drink sensibly and maturely, and by lowering the drinking age, the concept of alcohol would be normalized, encouraging open conversations about drinking and reducing the stigma around seeking help for alcohol-related issues.

Additionally, it is argued that if the drinking age was lowered to 18, people would be less likely to obtain and use false identifications, which can jeopardize their futures. Furthermore, the argument is made that if students could buy their own drinks, they would be less likely to try to have older people buy drinks for them, reducing the risk of having something unknown placed in their drink.

Finally, the debate around the drinking age often references the "age of majority", which is the age at which an individual is legally considered an adult and is granted full legal rights and responsibilities. Most countries have set the age of majority at 18, yet in the US, the age varies, with Mississippi setting it at 21, Alabama and Nebraska at 19, and some states at 18. This inconsistency has led to questions about why a person may be allowed to enlist in the military but not consume alcohol at 18 years old.

The negative effects of underground drinking

The negative effects of underage drinking are well-documented and far-reaching. Firstly, alcohol is a significant factor in the deaths of people under 21 in the United States each year. This includes fatalities from motor vehicle crashes, homicides, alcohol overdoses, falls, burns, drowning, and suicides. In addition to these tragic losses of life, underage drinking also results in a high number of injuries, with approximately 188,000 people under 21 requiring emergency treatment for alcohol-related injuries in 2011 alone.

The impact of underage drinking extends beyond physical harm, with academic problems and poor school performance also linked to alcohol use. Underage drinkers are also more likely to engage in risky behaviours, including unprotected sex, drug use, and driving under the influence. This can lead to long-term consequences, such as increased rates of sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancies, as well as legal repercussions and health risks associated with substance abuse.

The social and economic costs of underage drinking are also significant. It is associated with increased rates of violent crime, property damage, and domestic abuse. The financial burden of underage drinking includes the costs of healthcare, public safety, and criminal justice responses to these issues.

Furthermore, those who start drinking at a younger age are at a higher risk of developing alcohol use disorders later in life. This can lead to long-term health problems, including liver disease, heart problems, and an increased risk of certain cancers.

The negative consequences of underage drinking highlight the importance of preventing and reducing alcohol consumption among minors. This includes implementing and enforcing minimum legal drinking age laws, as well as educating young people about the risks associated with alcohol use.

The impact on road safety

The impact of lowering the legal drinking age on road safety is a critical aspect of the debate surrounding the minimum legal drinking age (MLDA). Currently, most US states and territories have set the MLDA at 21 years, with a few exceptions, such as Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, New Hampshire, and West Virginia, which allow underage consumption under specific circumstances.

Lowering the MLDA would likely have a detrimental effect on road safety and increase traffic accidents, injuries, and fatalities. Research suggests that young people who start drinking at an early age are more prone to binge drinking and are at a higher risk of being involved in alcohol-related crashes. When the MLDA was lowered in some states, drunk driving crashes increased, and there was a significant rise in the number of drunk teens in emergency rooms.

On the other hand, proponents of lowering the MLDA argue that allowing young adults to drink in controlled environments, such as restaurants and educational settings, could teach responsible drinking habits through role modeling and educational programs. They attribute the current irresponsible drinking patterns among underage youth to the allure of forbidden fruit and rebellion against authority. However, history and research contradict this claim, as states with a lower MLDA have consistently reported higher rates of underage drinking and drinking-and-driving problems.

The effectiveness of MLDA-21 laws in reducing youth drinking and driving is well-established. Studies have shown that these laws have not only decreased drinking among young people but have also led to a shift in cultural attitudes, making drinking and driving less socially acceptable within this age group. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that MLDA-21 laws have saved thousands of lives, with approximately 800 to 900 lives saved annually due to reduced drunk driving crashes.

In conclusion, lowering the legal drinking age would likely have a negative impact on road safety. The current MLDA of 21 years has proven effective in reducing underage drinking, drunk driving crashes, and associated fatalities. While there are arguments for controlled exposure to alcohol for young adults, the potential risks to road safety and the well-being of young people outweigh any potential benefits.

Alcohol-related fatalities

Firstly, it is well-established that alcohol impairs a person's ability to drive safely. Studies have consistently shown that higher minimum legal drinking ages (MLDA) are linked to lower rates of motor vehicle fatalities. In the United States, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that approximately 800 to 900 lives are saved each year due to the MLDA being set at 21. Since the introduction of the MLDA 21, drunk driving fatalities have decreased by a third, resulting in an estimated 31,417 lives saved from 1975 to 2016. Lowering the legal drinking age would likely lead to a significant increase in traffic accidents, injuries, and deaths.

Secondly, alcohol consumption, especially among youth, increases the risk of fatal crashes. Data shows that teens get drunk twice as fast as adults and have more difficulty knowing when to stop. When states had lower legal drinking ages, the problem of underage drinking was more severe. In states with a drinking age of 18, teens statistically drank more and continued to drink more as adults in their early 20s. Additionally, teens who drink are seven times more likely to be involved in alcohol-related crashes, and drunk driving crashes involving teens have decreased by an estimated 16% due to the current MLDA.

Furthermore, alcohol-related fatalities extend beyond traffic accidents. Alcohol consumption is linked to an increased risk of suicide and homicide, with higher drinking ages providing a protective effect, especially for adult women. Additionally, alcohol plays a significant role in domestic violence. A study in India found that men who were legally allowed to drink were more likely to consume alcohol and commit violence against their partners. Lowering the MLDA could potentially lead to an increase in domestic abuse rates.

While some argue that lower drinking ages will promote safer drinking habits among youth, the evidence suggests otherwise. History has shown that when the legal drinking age was lowered, youth started drinking earlier, binge drinking escalated, and the number of drunk teens in emergency rooms increased. Additionally, teen alcohol use results in approximately 4,300 deaths each year, surpassing the combined death toll of all illegal drugs. Therefore, maintaining a higher MLDA is crucial in reducing alcohol-related fatalities and protecting the health and safety of young people.

The effect on underage drinking rates

The minimum legal drinking age has been a topic of debate for decades, with proponents of a lower drinking age arguing that it would curb binge drinking and promote responsible drinking behaviours among young adults. However, the impact of lowering the legal drinking age on underage drinking rates is a complex issue with potential benefits and drawbacks.

One argument in favour of lowering the drinking age is that it would reduce the allure of alcohol as a "forbidden fruit". Proponents of this view suggest that when alcohol is prohibited, it becomes more enticing to young people as a symbol of rebellion and adulthood. By lowering the drinking age, the excitement associated with breaking the rules would diminish, and young people may be less inclined to engage in risky drinking behaviours. Additionally, supporters of a lower drinking age argue that it would allow young adults to learn about responsible drinking in controlled environments, such as restaurants, pubs, and educational institutions.

On the other hand, there is significant evidence to suggest that raising the minimum legal drinking age has been effective in reducing underage drinking rates. After the minimum legal drinking age was raised to 21 in the United States, the percentage of young people aged 18 to 20 who drank alcohol in the past month decreased from 59% to 40% between 1985 and 1991. This trend was also observed among young adults aged 21 to 25, with a decrease from 70% to 56% during the same period. Lower drinking ages in the past have been associated with a worse underage drinking problem, as evidenced by higher rates of drunk driving crashes and fatalities.

Furthermore, research suggests that young people who start drinking at an early age are more likely to engage in binge drinking and experience negative health consequences. In states with a minimum drinking age of 18, teens statistically drank more and continued to drink more as adults in their early 20s. Lowering the drinking age may inadvertently encourage drinking at a younger age, leading to potential health risks and an increased likelihood of alcohol-related harm.

While the debate continues, it is essential to consider the potential consequences of any changes to the legal drinking age on underage drinking rates. The impact of such a decision could have significant implications for public health, safety, and the well-being of young people.

Frequently asked questions