Alcohol Bans: Should Colleges Have The Right To Decide?

Alcohol abuse is a pervasive issue on college campuses, and administrators have struggled to find effective solutions. While some colleges have implemented alcohol bans to curb binge drinking and alcohol-related hospitalizations, others argue that such prohibitions may not address the underlying issues and could potentially drive drinking underground or off-campus. This debate centers around the question of whether colleges should have the authority to ban alcohol on their campuses and, if so, whether such bans are an effective strategy for promoting student safety and well-being.

Bans may not solve problems of binge drinking and sexual misconduct

Critics of alcohol bans on college campuses argue that such bans do not solve the problems of binge drinking and sexual misconduct. A 2001 report by Harvard University's College Alcohol Study compared colleges that ban all alcohol to those that do not. The survey found that students at colleges with a ban were 30% less likely to be heavy episodic drinkers and more likely to abstain from alcohol. However, among drinkers, students at schools with a ban engaged in as much extreme drinking and experienced the same rate of alcohol-related problems as students at schools without a ban. This indicates that bans may not effectively address the issue of binge drinking.

Furthermore, critics argue that alcohol bans may not prevent sexual misconduct and could potentially make it more difficult to address. Sexual assault prevention advocates say that alcohol bans can make victims who have been drinking hesitant to come forward. Additionally, critics warn that bans may simply push drinking off campus, reducing the control that colleges have over student safety. There is also a risk that students will engage in pre-gaming, drinking large amounts of alcohol before heading to on-campus parties, which could increase the dangers associated with alcohol consumption.

While colleges have a responsibility to address harmful drinking cultures and create safe environments, the effectiveness of alcohol bans in achieving these goals is questionable. Critics suggest that a comprehensive approach is needed, including educational programs, restrictions on alcohol distribution, and initiatives to change drinking culture. For example, Bowdoin College's low number of alcohol hospitalizations is attributed not only to its ban but also to educational programming, open dialogue, enforcement, and students looking out for one another.

Additionally, the effectiveness of alcohol bans in reducing binge drinking may be limited by the drinking culture among college students. Drinking is often seen as an integral part of the college experience, and students may find ways to continue drinking despite the bans. As a result, colleges may need to focus on changing drinking culture and providing resources to help students make safer choices, rather than solely relying on prohibitive measures.

Overall, while colleges have a duty to protect their students, the implementation of alcohol bans may not be the most effective strategy to address binge drinking and sexual misconduct. A more holistic approach that considers the complexities of these issues and involves the entire college community may be more successful in creating a safer and healthier campus environment.

Bans may not be enforceable and may drive drinking underground

Critics of alcohol bans on college campuses argue that such bans may not be enforceable and may drive drinking underground. For instance, critics of Stanford's hard liquor ban claim that it will not solve the issues of binge drinking and sexual misconduct. Instead, students may simply opt to drink other types of alcohol or frequent off-campus parties. There is also a risk that students will pre-game with hard liquor in their dorm rooms before heading to on-campus parties, making it more difficult for colleges to monitor drinking and its associated problems.

A 2001 report by Harvard University's College Alcohol Study found that while students at colleges with a complete drinking ban were 30% less likely to be heavy episodic drinkers and more likely to abstain from alcohol, students who still drank engaged in as much extreme drinking and experienced the same rate of alcohol-related problems as their counterparts at colleges without bans. This suggests that bans may not be effective in reducing harmful drinking behaviours and may simply drive drinking underground.

Furthermore, some argue that alcohol bans may not be enforceable given the historical failure of prohibition. For example, when one college pub closed due to permit troubles, students simply started driving off-campus to find parties or bars, potentially increasing the risks associated with drinking and driving. Similarly, critics of Dartmouth's hard liquor ban warn that the ban may simply push drinking off-campus, reducing the college's ability to ensure student safety.

While colleges have a responsibility to implement measures to reduce harmful drinking behaviours, a comprehensive approach is necessary. For example, Bowdoin College's alcohol ban has been accompanied by educational programming, open dialogue, enforcement, and students looking out for one another, which may have contributed to its success in reducing alcohol hospitalizations. Thus, while bans may play a role in reducing harmful drinking behaviours, they must be combined with other measures to effectively address the complex issue of college drinking culture.

Bans may reduce the number of applicants to a college

Colleges are free to ban alcohol on their campuses, and some choose to do so for various reasons. For example, religious schools ban alcohol because it violates religious tenets. Other colleges may want to appeal to students who don't drink or want to follow the law, as drinking alcohol under 21 is illegal in the US.

However, implementing such a ban may reduce the number of applicants to a college. A college applicant may view a ban on alcohol as an infringement on their freedom, especially if they are over 21 and are legally allowed to drink. They may also be deterred by the prospect of having to go off-campus to bars or parties to drink, which could be inconvenient and even dangerous if they have to drive.

Some colleges have tried to address this issue by allowing alcohol on campus but prohibiting hard liquor, which has a high alcohol content. However, critics argue that this doesn't solve the problem of binge drinking and that students will simply drink hard liquor before going to on-campus parties.

Research has shown that students at colleges with complete drinking bans are 30% less likely to be heavy episodic drinkers and more likely to abstain from alcohol. However, among students who still drink, heavy drinking is just as common as at colleges without alcohol bans. Therefore, while a ban may reduce drinking overall, it may not change the drinking culture among those who are determined to drink.

Ultimately, a college's decision to ban alcohol is a trade-off. While it may attract some students who prefer a dry campus, it may also deter others who view the ban as an unwelcome restriction on their freedom.

Bans may not be effective without other measures, such as education

While banning alcohol on college campuses has been shown to reduce the number of heavy episodic drinkers and increase the number of students who abstain from alcohol, bans may not be effective without other measures, such as education.

A 2001 report by Harvard University's College Alcohol Study found that students at colleges with a ban were 30% less likely to be heavy episodic drinkers and more likely to abstain from alcohol. However, the survey also found that among drinkers, students at schools with a ban engaged in as much extreme drinking and experienced the same rate of alcohol-related problems as students at schools without a ban. This suggests that while bans can be effective in reducing overall alcohol consumption, they may not address the underlying issues that lead to extreme drinking and alcohol-related problems.

Critics of alcohol bans on college campuses argue that they may not effectively solve problems related to binge drinking and sexual misconduct. Instead, students may simply shift their drinking habits to off-campus locations or engage in pre-gaming with hard alcohol in their dorm rooms before on-campus parties. This can make it more difficult for colleges to monitor and address alcohol-related issues.

To address these concerns, experts recommend implementing comprehensive prevention programs that include education and awareness campaigns, enforcement of alcohol policies, and the provision of alternative social activities for students. For example, Bowdoin College's vice president for communications and public affairs, Scott Hood, credits the college's low number of alcohol hospitalizations not just to its alcohol ban but also to educational programming, open dialogue, enforcement, and a culture of students looking out for one another.

Additionally, colleges can offer substance-free housing, which has been associated with lower levels of binge drinking and alcohol-related problems. Providing students with late-night shuttle services can also help prevent drinking and driving. By combining bans with other preventive measures, colleges can more effectively address the issues of alcohol abuse and its associated risks.

In conclusion, while banning alcohol on college campuses can be a step towards creating a safer and healthier environment for students, it should be complemented with educational and preventive measures to effectively reduce extreme drinking and alcohol-related harm.

Bans may be effective at reducing heavy episodic drinking

Bans on alcohol may be effective in reducing heavy episodic drinking on college campuses. A 2001 report by Harvard University's College Alcohol Study found that students at colleges with a ban on alcohol were 30% less likely to be heavy episodic drinkers and more likely to abstain from alcohol. The study also found a correlation between banning alcohol and lower rates of heavy drinking.

However, the survey also found that among drinkers, students at schools with a ban engaged in as much extreme drinking and experienced the same rate of alcohol-related problems as students at schools without an alcohol ban. Critics of alcohol bans on college campuses argue that such bans may not solve problems of binge drinking and sexual misconduct. There is also a risk that students will simply drink elsewhere, such as off-campus bars and parties, or engage in "pre-gaming" by consuming hard alcohol in their dorm rooms before heading to on-campus parties.

Despite these concerns, some colleges have implemented alcohol bans with positive results. For example, Colby College in Maine adopted a hard liquor ban in 2010 after 14 students were hospitalized for alcohol poisoning during a single-day event. The college reports that since the policy went into effect, both hospitalizations and blood alcohol levels have dropped notably.

In addition to alcohol bans, other interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing alcohol consumption among college-age populations, such as brief screening and intervention programs, family-based interventions, and policy initiatives like establishing alcohol-free dormitories and prohibiting self-service of alcohol at campus events.

Overall, while alcohol bans on college campuses may be effective in reducing heavy episodic drinking, they should be combined with other measures, such as educational programming, open dialogue, enforcement, and peer support, to create a comprehensive approach to changing the drinking culture on campus.

Frequently asked questions