The Ethics Of Alcohol And Tobacco Advertising

Alcohol and tobacco are two of the most heavily regulated consumer products in the world. Both products are legal for adults to consume but can be harmful when used excessively. As such, the marketing of these products is a highly contentious issue. While companies want to promote their brands, governments and health organisations want to limit the exposure of these products to minors and vulnerable people. Alcohol advertising is heavily regulated, with rules surrounding the placement of ads, the content of the creative messages, and the target audience. Tobacco advertising is also heavily restricted, with some countries banning it outright. However, tobacco companies have been known to fund anti-smoking groups and create ads that claim to discourage teen smoking, which has been shown to have the opposite effect. This raises the question: should alcohol or tobacco companies be allowed to advertise at all?

The effects of advertising on consumption

One school of thought, supported by empirical studies, suggests that advertising does not increase tobacco and alcohol consumption. For example, a study examining the relationship between tobacco industry-sponsored advertising and youth smoking found that exposure to such advertising was either unrelated to or increased the probability of smoking. In contrast, higher exposure to state-sponsored tobacco control advertisements was significantly associated with lower smoking levels. Additionally, the oligopolistic nature of the tobacco and alcohol industries may result in competition for market share through advertising rather than price, with the assumption that increased advertising spend leads to increased consumption. However, studies using national aggregate data tend to find little effect of advertising on consumption, supporting the prediction of the advertising response function.

On the other hand, several studies have found a positive relationship between advertising exposure and consumption, particularly among adolescents. Research has shown that exposure to alcohol advertising can change teens' attitudes about alcohol and increase their likelihood of drinking. This is especially concerning given that neighborhoods with many alcohol outlets provide more opportunities for underage youth to purchase alcohol, and alcohol advertisements are often placed near areas with high youth concentrations. A smaller number of studies have found a positive association between advertising exposure and the quantity of alcohol consumed by underage youth. Similarly, studies have concluded that tobacco advertising causes teen smoking, and there is a scientific consensus supporting this relationship. The use of themes appealing to youth aspirations, such as high energy, sexuality, popularity, and humor, in both alcohol and tobacco advertising, further contributes to the vulnerability of adolescents to the influence of these advertisements.

Furthermore, the primary conclusions of a study by Dhaval Dave indicated that alcohol advertising bans decrease alcohol consumption. The study found that an additional ban could reduce consumption by 5 to 8 percent. However, it also noted that recent decreases in alcohol consumption may decrease the likelihood of new bans and weaken existing ones, as observed in Canada, Denmark, New Zealand, and Finland, which have recently rescinded alcohol advertising bans.

In conclusion, while the effects of advertising on consumption remain a subject of ongoing research, the weight of evidence suggests a positive relationship, particularly in the case of adolescents. The influence of advertising on youth is a significant concern and has prompted calls for evidence-based efforts to reduce advertising that influences adolescent consumption of alcohol and tobacco.

The First Amendment and free speech

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, which includes the right to advertise. However, this right is not absolute, and there are certain limitations, especially when it comes to advertising harmful products such as alcohol and tobacco.

In recent years, there have been several court cases that have tested the boundaries of the First Amendment in relation to alcohol and tobacco advertising. For example, in the case of Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly (2001), the Supreme Court struck down restrictions on cigar and smokeless tobacco advertising, citing First Amendment commercial free speech grounds. Similarly, in 1995, the court invalidated a federal ban on placing the alcoholic content of beer on labels. These cases set a precedent for protecting commercial speech under the First Amendment.

On the other hand, public health advocacy organizations and state governments have also taken steps to restrict alcohol and tobacco advertising, particularly to youth. For instance, in 1998, tobacco companies settled with states, prohibiting certain tobacco advertising and requiring health warnings on products. In 2009, Congress passed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, which mandated graphic health warnings on cigarette packages and advertising. These actions were taken to address the public health harms caused by tobacco use, which can result in serious illnesses and even death.

The debate surrounding alcohol and tobacco advertising highlights the tension between protecting commercial free speech under the First Amendment and safeguarding public health. While some argue that companies have the right to promote their products, others emphasize the potential harm caused by these products and the need to protect consumers, especially minors. This has led to ongoing legal battles and varying restrictions on alcohol and tobacco advertising across different jurisdictions.

Overall, while the First Amendment provides a degree of protection for alcohol and tobacco companies to advertise, it does not grant them unlimited freedom to do so. The courts, public health organizations, and state governments have all played a role in shaping the boundaries of alcohol and tobacco advertising, aiming to balance free speech rights with the need to protect public health and prevent harmful products from being promoted to vulnerable populations.

Self-regulation and government intervention

The consumption of tobacco and alcohol is known to have potentially adverse health consequences. While empirical studies indicate that advertising does not increase tobacco and alcohol consumption, many public health advocacy organisations disagree with these findings.

In the United States, the marketing and advertising of alcoholic beverages and products are regulated under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA) by the Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB), which is hosted by the Department of the Treasury. However, the First Amendment allows for freedom of speech, which limits how much the federal government can regulate advertising, even in regard to alcohol.

On the federal level, many of the regulations and rules surrounding the advertisement of alcoholic beverages are self-imposed and voluntary. Alcoholic beverage companies and the advertising industry generally agree to self-regulatory standards designed to discourage underage drinking based on ad placement or content. For example, self-adopted regulations prohibit targeting minors, either by using images or age-directed marketing ploys that may intentionally attract younger consumers. Many companies have age-related safeguards in place on their websites and within their marketing communication procedures, such as “age gates" that verify a consumer's age before allowing them to enter.

While self-regulation is important, government intervention is also necessary to address critical public policy concerns. For instance, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has jurisdiction over deceptive or unfair advertising for alcoholic beverages and has taken action in cases of alleged deceptive marketing. In 1991, the FTC issued a consent order against the Canandaigua Wine Company for the alleged deceptive marketing of Cisco, a fortified, flavored wine product. The company's packaging and advertising misrepresented Cisco as a low-alcohol wine cooler, which resulted in alcohol poisoning in several consumers. The order prohibited Canandaigua Wine Company from making representations that Cisco is a low-alcohol, single-serving product and required changes in its marketing and packaging to distinguish it from wine coolers.

In terms of tobacco advertising, a study found that exposure to tobacco industry-sponsored advertising was either unrelated to, or increased, the probability of smoking among eighth, tenth, and twelfth graders. In contrast, higher exposure to advertisements that were part of a state-sponsored tobacco control media campaign was significantly associated with lower levels of smoking. This suggests that government intervention in the form of public health campaigns can be effective in reducing tobacco consumption.

Targeting minors and underage drinking

Alcohol and tobacco are both known to have adverse health consequences, with tobacco use resulting in illness in proportion to its consumption, and alcohol being a causal factor in cancer in seven areas of the body. The consumption of these substances is particularly harmful to minors and young people, whose brains are still developing. Alcohol is the third leading cause of preventable death in the US, and underage drinking has a range of negative effects, including an increased likelihood of sexual assault, trouble in school, and alcohol problems later in life. Young people consume 11% of all alcohol in the US, which equates to a huge profit for alcohol companies from underage drinking.

Alcohol companies have been accused of targeting young people with their advertising, with researchers finding that alcohol advertisers routinely violate the self-regulatory standards designed to discourage underage drinking. A study published in the Journal of Public Health Policy found that youth exposure to alcohol advertising on television had grown faster than adult exposure, and that alcohol advertisers were targeting underage viewers. Alcohol ads spark young people's interest in trying alcohol, and normalise the idea that "it must be cool to drink". Alcohol companies have vowed to self-regulate to keep their advertisements away from children, but researchers have found that they routinely violate these codes, with advertisements placed in locations with a lot of underage traffic, such as near schools and playgrounds.

There are regulations in place to prevent alcohol advertising from targeting minors, such as the requirement that no more than 28.4% of the audience of an ad be underage, and that physical advertisements are not placed near locations with high levels of underage traffic. However, these regulations have been found to be ineffective at protecting youth from exposure to alcohol advertising. For example, a study by the Prevention Action Alliance found that alcohol advertisers were routinely violating the codes designed to protect children, with 19 studies and 25 content analysis studies finding content harmful to children and adolescents.

To prevent underage drinking, advocates can strengthen their community's ability to resist alcohol advertising. This can include creating healthy alternatives to drinking, enforcing social hosting laws, and holding businesses accountable for selling alcohol to minors. Colleges and universities can also play a role by setting and enforcing campus rules on alcohol use and restricting the advertising and availability of alcohol products on or near campus. Increasing the tax on alcohol and using the revenue to fund counter-marketing campaigns could also help to shift perceptions around drinking for young people.

Ad placement and content

Advertising for tobacco and alcohol is a highly contentious issue, with many public health advocacy organisations concerned about the potential negative health and social outcomes of consumption. While some studies indicate that advertising does not increase tobacco and alcohol consumption, others suggest that an increase in advertising bans could reduce consumption.

Advertising for tobacco and alcohol is subject to strict regulations, particularly concerning the placement of ads and their content. In the United States, the marketing and advertising of alcoholic beverages and products are regulated under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA) by the Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB), hosted by the Department of the Treasury.

The TTB has outlined specific requirements for the content of alcohol advertisements, including mandatory information such as the alcohol content shown as a percentage by volume, and the name and contact information of the responsible advertiser. While the TTB does not require pre-approval of advertisements, they recommend that advertisers consider placing mandatory statements in a logical location within the advertisement or providing a direct link to another webpage with all the mandatory information.

State and federal regulations also play a role in ad placement and content. For example, some states have regulations regarding the proximity of print advertisements for alcohol to certain locations, such as civic events with large underage audiences. Federal regulations focus on discouraging underage drinking, with alcoholic beverage companies agreeing to self-regulatory standards based on ad placement and content.

Digital media is also subject to regulations, with alcoholic beverage companies implementing age-related safeguards on their websites and marketing communication procedures, such as \"age gates\" to verify the consumer's legal drinking age.

The tobacco industry is subject to even stricter regulations. For instance, manufacturers and distributors are prohibited from using brand names, logos, or any other product identification on items or services that are not tobacco products. They are also prohibited from sponsoring social or cultural events that promote tobacco use.

While the First Amendment allows for freedom of speech, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has jurisdiction over deceptive or unfair advertising for alcoholic beverages and will take action in appropriate cases. For example, the FTC issued a consent order against a wine company for deceptive marketing, resulting in changes to their marketing and packaging to clearly distinguish their product's high alcohol content.

Frequently asked questions