Who's Still In Prison From Prohibition?

The Prohibition era in the United States, which lasted from 1920 to 1933, was marked by a ban on the manufacture, transportation, and sale of alcoholic beverages. It is unclear if anyone remains incarcerated specifically for Prohibition violations, but the era's legacy of incarceration is notable. The daily prisoner population in the federal system surged during Prohibition, and even after its repeal, incarceration rates continued to climb before stabilizing in the 1940s. The trade in illegal alcohol thrived, leading to a decline in alcohol quality and an average of 1000 deaths annually from tainted liquor. The lucrative nature of the illicit trade also contributed to widespread corruption among law enforcement, with many officers tempted by bribes or drawn into bootlegging. While there may not be any individuals still serving sentences from the Prohibition era, the social and legal repercussions of this period had a lasting impact on the United States.

Prohibition's negative economic impact

Prohibition, one of the most dramatic policy experiments in US history, had several negative economic impacts. Firstly, the prohibition of alcohol sales resulted in significant revenue losses for the US economy. Alcohol was a major industry, with liquor taxes alone generating $226 million in revenue in 1914. The prohibition of alcohol sales led to the shutdown of distilleries, breweries, and liquor stores, causing a direct loss in tax revenue.

Secondly, the prohibition caused widespread job losses. Large alcohol-producing companies, which once employed thousands of workers and generated millions in sales, were forced to shut down. Additionally, establishments solely focused on alcohol sales closed, resulting in further job losses and a decline in economic activity.

Thirdly, the emergence of illegal alcohol production and distribution led to an increase in organized crime. Crime syndicates capitalized on the opportunity to produce and distribute alcohol, leading to a rise in arrests and the need for increased government spending to combat alcohol-related crimes. The cost of enforcing prohibition almost doubled from $6.3 million in 1921 to $13.4 million in 1930.

Moreover, the prohibition had unintended consequences on related industries. Supporters expected to see a boost in sales of clothing, household goods, and an increase in rents and entertainment industries. However, these predictions did not materialize. Instead, restaurants, theaters, and other amusement industries experienced a decline in revenue as they could no longer rely on legal liquor sales to attract customers.

Finally, the illegal alcohol trade had serious consequences for public health and safety. The quality of alcohol on the black market declined, resulting in an average of 1000 deaths per year from tainted liquor. Additionally, the large sums of money exchanged during the prohibition era led to corruption within law enforcement, further eroding public trust.

In conclusion, while the prohibition of alcohol was intended to address social issues, it had significant negative economic repercussions, including revenue and job losses, increased government spending, declines in related industries, and the growth of organized crime and illegal activities.

The rise of organised crime

The prohibition of alcohol in the United States, which went into effect in January 1920, had far-reaching consequences, including the rise of organised crime. Before Prohibition, criminal gangs were local menaces, running protection rackets and engaging in vice entrepreneurship. However, the illegal alcohol trade transformed these gangs into sophisticated, interstate, and even international enterprises.

The demand for illegal alcohol was high, and the profits were immense. Mob kingpins like Capone made as much as $100 million a year in the mid-1920s (approximately $1.4 billion in 2018), and spent half a million dollars a month in bribes. The money was laundered through new casinos and hotels in Nevada after gambling was legalised in 1931. The bootlegging business also led to the formation of new gangs and collaborations across ethnic lines, with Italians, Irish, Jews, and Poles working together. However, inter-gang rivalries, shootings, bombings, and killings were common, with over 1,000 people killed in New York alone during Prohibition.

The illegal alcohol trade also corrupted law enforcement, with police officers and Prohibition agents tempted by bribes or the opportunity to engage in bootlegging themselves. This undermined public trust in law enforcement during this era. The growth of the illegal liquor trade also turned millions of Americans into criminals, as they became experts in making their own alcohol.

One of the key figures in the rise of organised crime during Prohibition was Charles "Lucky" Luciano, an Italian immigrant who began working for illegal gambling boss Arnold Rothstein at the outset of Prohibition. By the mid-1920s, Luciano was a multimillionaire and New York's top bootlegger, partnering with other associates like Meyer Lansky and Benjamin "Bugsy" Siegel. Luciano has been credited with practically creating the modern brand of organised crime, led by the Commission, which comprised the bosses of the top five Italian-American crime families in New York.

Corrupt law enforcement

During the Prohibition era in the United States, which began on 17 January 1920, the trade in illegal alcohol was highly lucrative. As a result, the sums of money being exchanged during this period proved a corrupting influence on law enforcement. Police officers and Prohibition agents were frequently tempted by bribes or the opportunity to go into bootlegging themselves. Many stayed honest, but enough succumbed to the temptation that the stereotype of the corrupt Prohibition agent or local cop undermined public trust in law enforcement for the duration of the era.

Corruption existed wherever people were empowered to enforce Prohibition. For example, many members of the US Coast Guard made huge profits by escorting rum-running boats into ports. Customs agents often enjoyed bribes from bootleggers, who paid them to be absent for a specific period of time during which smugglers could bring in large amounts of alcohol. Bootleggers also paid off local police officers in exchange for tip-offs about federal raids and to look the other way.

The high profits of bootlegging went straight into the pockets of corrupt officials. Al Capone, for instance, reportedly earned $60 million in 1927 and had half of Chicago's police force on his payroll. He claimed that he had "nothing against the honest cop on the beat" and that he would simply have them "transferred someplace where they can't do [him] any harm".

The Bureau of Prohibition, the federal law enforcement agency responsible for investigating the possession, distribution, consumption, and trafficking of alcohol, was also riddled with corruption. By 1930, 1,587 out of 17,816 federal Prohibition employees had been fired for various offences, including bribery, embezzlement, and robbery. Many Prohibition agents lacked the training and numbers to effectively combat bootleggers.

Despite the corruption, some law enforcement officers remained "untouchable", famously including Eliot Ness and his team, who were portrayed in books, movies, and TV series. These agents were known for their refusal to accept bribes, which set them apart from their easily corrupted counterparts.

The creation of moonshine runners

Moonshine, a term derived from the tradition of distilling alcohol under the cover of night to evade detection, became synonymous with the illicit alcohol trade during Prohibition. It refers to any high-proof spirit that is illegally distilled, often in rural areas, and has a long history in the South, dating back to the 18th century when it was brought over by Irish and Scottish immigrants.

The federal government sent agents, known as "revenuers", to crack down on illegal liquor operations and stem the loss of tax revenue. To evade these agents, moonshiners used creative methods, such as modifying their vehicles and developing secret recipes, some of which resulted in tainted liquor that posed serious health risks to consumers.

The trade in illegal alcohol during Prohibition had far-reaching consequences, including the corruption of law enforcement officials, the rise of organized crime, and the transformation of social and economic landscapes. The creation of moonshine runners was a pivotal aspect of this underground industry, reflecting the ingenuity and resilience of those who sought to circumvent the restrictions imposed by the prohibition of alcohol.

Increased incarceration rates

I could not find specific information on whether anyone is still incarcerated from the prohibition of alcohol. However, I can provide some information on incarceration rates during the Prohibition era.

Prohibition in the United States began on January 19, 1920, and made the manufacture, sale, and transportation of intoxicating beverages illegal. However, it did not outlaw the possession or consumption of alcohol. As a result, a black market for alcohol emerged, along with crime syndicates dedicated to distributing it. The trade in illegal alcohol was very lucrative, but it also led to increased incarceration rates as millions of Americans became criminals by participating in the underground liquor market.

The specific impact of Prohibition on incarceration rates is hard to determine due to a lack of uniform national statistics gathered about crime before 1930. However, there are indications that Prohibition led to an increase in arrests and incarceration for alcohol-related offenses. For example, there was a decline in arrests for public drunkenness during the Prohibition era, indicating that people were drinking less in public to avoid arrest.

In addition, the Prohibition era saw the emergence of "moonshine runners" or "'shine runners," who modified their cars to outrun law enforcement while transporting illegal alcohol. This suggests that there was an increase in arrests and incarceration for alcohol-related offenses such as transportation and distribution.

Overall, while the exact numbers are unclear, it is safe to assume that Prohibition led to an increase in incarceration rates for alcohol-related offenses, particularly for those involved in the illegal manufacture, sale, and transportation of alcohol.

Frequently asked questions