Fas And Child Endangerment: Pennsylvania's Stance

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) is a serious condition that can occur when a baby is exposed to alcohol during the prenatal stage. This exposure can interfere with the baby's brain development and cause a range of physical, behavioral, and cognitive impairments that can last a lifetime. In Pennsylvania, the prevalence of FASD is estimated to affect between 3,983 and 6,830 children annually. While the state recognizes the severity of this disorder, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that a mother's use of opioids or alcohol while pregnant does not constitute civil child abuse under the Child Protective Services Law (CPSL). This decision highlights the complexity of defining a child and the intention to protect and support families rather than penalize them. However, it's important to note that child endangerment laws in Pennsylvania are still stringent, and any person supervising the welfare of a child who violates their duty of protection, support, or care can be found guilty of child endangerment.

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD)

FASD can lead to lifelong disabilities and impairments that may appear at any time during childhood. These impairments can include deficits in the central nervous system (CNS), such as small brain size or alterations in specific brain regions, resulting in cognitive and behavioural issues, motor and coordination problems, and difficulties with daily life skills like feeding, bathing, counting money, and minding personal safety. Individuals with FASD may also experience secondary disabilities, including medical, educational, mental health, and social challenges, and are subject to stigmatization.

The prevalence of FASD in the United States is estimated to be between 2.4 and 4.8 per 100, which translates to between 3,983 and 6,830 children born with FASD in Pennsylvania each year. However, the exact number of people with FASD is unknown due to the difficulty in diagnosing the disorder, and it often goes undetected. Recent studies from Canada suggest that between 0.1% and 3% of children and youth have been diagnosed with FASD.

While there is no cure for FASD, early identification and intervention are critical for the well-being of affected individuals and their families. Treatment programs are individualized and typically coordinated by a developmental paediatrician, focusing on educational and behavioural strategies to maximize independence and achievements.

In terms of legal implications, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that a mother's use of opioids while pregnant does not constitute civil child abuse under the Child Protective Services Law (CPSL). This decision clarifies that a mother's drug use during pregnancy should not be deemed child abuse without explicit statutory language to support such a finding. However, the decision does not prevent child welfare agencies from intervening in cases with prenatal substance exposure, and removal may still occur to protect the child.

Child Protective Services Law (CPSL)

The Child Protective Services Law (CPSL) in Pennsylvania aims to protect abused children from further injury and impairment by providing them with urgent and effective protective services. The law establishes procedures for responding to suspected child abuse and protective services concerns. County agencies and law enforcement officials play a crucial role in investigating allegations of child abuse, ensuring the immediate safety of the child, and providing necessary interventions or services to protect the child, including removal if warranted.

The CPSL defines key terms related to child protection, including "health care provider", "safety assessment", "child-care services", "law enforcement official", "mandated reporter", and "school employee." It also outlines the roles and responsibilities of various entities, such as county agencies, law enforcement, and the department responsible for receiving and monitoring reports of child abuse and protective services.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has interpreted the CPSL in a case involving opioid use during pregnancy, clarifying that a mother's use of opioids while pregnant does not constitute civil child abuse under the law. The court reasoned that the definition of "child" under the CPSL does not include a fetus or unborn child, and therefore, a person cannot be considered a perpetrator of child abuse unless there is a "child" at the time of the act.

This decision has significant implications for child welfare and substance use during pregnancy. It emphasizes the importance of supporting families in seeking help for substance use disorders and ensures that women are not penalized for seeking prenatal care, medical services, or addiction treatment. However, it is important to note that the decision does not prevent child welfare agencies from intervening in cases of prenatal substance exposure to protect the child.

In Pennsylvania, the prevalence of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) is a concern, with an estimated daily count of 11-19 children being born with the disorder. FASD is a condition that occurs when a child is exposed to alcohol in utero, resulting in a range of physical, behavioural, and neurological effects. While the CPSL does not specifically address fetal alcohol exposure, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's interpretation of the law suggests that it would not be considered child abuse under the CPSL.

Pennsylvania child welfare system

The Pennsylvania child welfare system is a complex network of agencies, organisations, and laws designed to protect and support children and families. One of the key organisations within this system is the Department of Human Services, which provides resources and services to address issues such as mental health, substance use disorders, and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD). According to the Department of Human Services, FASD is a significant issue in Pennsylvania, with an estimated daily rate of 11-19 children being born with the disorder.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court plays a crucial role in interpreting and enforcing laws related to child welfare. In one notable case, the court addressed the issue of opioid use during pregnancy and whether it constitutes child abuse under the Child Protective Services Law (CPSL). The court held that a mother's use of opioids while pregnant does not constitute civil child abuse, as the definition of "child" under the CPSL does not include a fetus or unborn child. This decision reaffirmed the importance of supporting families in seeking help for substance use disorders without fear of legal repercussions.

Another organisation, PA Families Inc., aims to empower families by providing guidance and resources to navigate various systems, including education, healthcare, and social services. By helping families understand and access the support they need, PA Families Inc. plays a crucial role in the overall child welfare system in Pennsylvania.

While the Pennsylvania child welfare system offers a range of interventions and services to protect children, it also faces challenges, including substance use disorders and prenatal exposure to opioids and alcohol. The system aims to address these issues through a combination of legal, healthcare, and social service interventions, with a focus on supporting families and protecting children.

Physical, behavioural, and cognitive impairments

In Pennsylvania, the consumption of alcohol by a mother during pregnancy is not considered child endangerment. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a mother's consumption of opioids or alcohol while pregnant is not civil child abuse under the Child Protective Services Law (CPSL). The court reasoned that the definition of "child" does not include a fetus or unborn child, and hence a person cannot be a perpetrator of child abuse unless there is a "child" at the time of the act.

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) is the umbrella term for a range of diagnoses reflecting the outcomes of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure (PAE). FASD can lead to a wide range of physical, mental, behavioural, and cognitive impairments. Children with FASD may not display the typical facial features associated with the disorder, such as short palpebral fissures, a thin upper lip, and an indistinct philtrum. However, the absence of these physical features does not indicate the absence of FASD, and a delay in receiving support can lead to poorer long-term outcomes.

Prenatal alcohol exposure is the leading preventable cause of cognitive deficits in developed countries. Children with FASD can experience a range of cognitive impairments, including difficulty understanding and retaining information, understanding the consequences of their actions, and lacking fear or judgement. They may also exhibit a lack of understanding of single-step instructions, resulting in difficulties following directions.

Behavioural impairments associated with FASD include hyperactivity, aggression, and destructive behaviour. Children with FASD may struggle with impulse control and regulating their emotions, often exhibiting frequent tantrums and aggressive behaviour. They may also have difficulty forming and maintaining social relationships due to their inability to interpret social cues and display appropriate social behaviour.

The prevalence of FASD in the United States is estimated to be between 2.4 and 4.8 per 100, with an estimated 3,983 to 6,830 children born with FASD in Pennsylvania in 2014. Early identification and intervention are crucial to ensure that children with FASD receive the necessary support and therapeutic interventions tailored to their needs.

Child endangerment penalties

In Pennsylvania, child endangerment occurs when a parent, guardian, or trusted supervisor of a child knowingly endangers the welfare of that child. The term "child endangerment" covers a wide range of alleged behaviors, and a conviction can have a negative impact on the rest of your life. Pennsylvania's criminal code defines endangering the welfare of children as follows:

> Any person supervising the welfare of a child under the age of 18, be it a guardian, a parent, or any other person, who violates a duty of protection, support, or care and thus knowingly endangers the child’s welfare is guilty of child endangerment.

Child endangerment in Pennsylvania could be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the case factors. In most cases, child endangerment is a first-degree misdemeanor, carrying a penalty of up to $10,000 in fines and up to five years in prison. For first-time offenders, the sentence typically does not exceed one year, depending on the severity of the endangerment and the presence of any prior criminal history.

If a prosecutor proves beyond a reasonable doubt that an alleged perpetrator engaged in a course of conduct—meaning a pattern of misconduct—the individual will be charged with a third-degree felony. If convicted, they face penalties of up to $15,000 in fines and a three-and-a-half-year prison sentence. An alleged perpetrator will also be charged and convicted of a third-degree felony if their actions created a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to a child.

It is important to note that, in Pennsylvania, a child does not have to suffer an injury or experience trauma for a parent, guardian, or trusted supervisor to be convicted of child endangerment. Additionally, the intentions of the parent, guardian, or trusted adult are irrelevant in child endangerment cases.

While the state's child endangerment law is vague and broadly applied, courts use their discretion to determine whether the conduct of a parent or guardian endangers a minor. Typically, this decision is based on what actions an average parent or guardian in a similar situation would reasonably believe to be a risk to the child.

It is worth mentioning that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that a mother's use of opioids while pregnant is not civil child abuse under the Child Protective Services Law (CPSL). The Court reasoned that the definition of "child" under the CPSL does not include a fetus or unborn child, and a person is not a perpetrator of child abuse unless there is a "child" at the time of the act.

Frequently asked questions